jangbones - 2010-11-16
HE'S SO ARROGANT AND SMUG AND HE WON'T SHUT UP ABOUT HIS BELIEFS
|
PegLegPete  - 2010-11-16
This is a badass show fyi.
|
StanleyPain - 2010-11-16
Alright everyone. Keep that in mind. John in London is kind of an idiot. Avoid this guy, ok?
|
themilkshark - 2010-11-16
The Atheist faith doesn't even have a God, yeesh.
|
|
Rudy - 2010-11-16
*SPOILER*
The Athiest Experience is one of frustration and constant face-palming.
|
phalsebob - 2010-11-16
For those who give a shit- This whole 100% accurate and correct phrasing (I can't call it rhetoric, let alone an argument) was started 3-4 years ago by Ray 'The Banana Man' Comfort when he started demanding 100% accurate and correct scientific proof for evolution or GTFO. It's taken years to explain why this is stupid to Ray, and it will be a lifetime for others.
If Woody Harolson and Chubbs here want to argue the same argument with the same idiots again and again for the next 30 years, good luck to them. And even then, the phrasing will only just change a bit...
|
Buggerman - 2010-11-16 I think that's why he hung up on John and said never again. I for one do not have the energy or patience to debate morons all day, but that is why I dont hold a controversial talk show or become a politician. I'm just glad there are other people to do the dirty work.
Id rather spend my time making meaningless comments on internet videos and the likes.
|
Innocent Bystander - 2010-11-16
So atheist don't believe in God? What's that all about?
|
Buggerman - 2010-11-16
I'll grant you that but...
|
Xenocide - 2010-11-16
Fundies vs. Reactionary Atheists is the world's longest, most bitter tennis game.
Except the ball is called "burden of proof," the rackets are long diatribes, and whenever the ball falls on someone's side of the net, he begins loudly insisting that it's actually on the other guy's side.
|
jangbones - 2010-11-16 yes except one side is actually correct and one is not
|
simon666 - 2010-11-17 Well, one side has a position that meets the criteria of analytical reason. So if this is what you mean by 'correct' then yes.
|
IrishWhiskey - 2010-12-29 More like this kind of tennis game:
A: Alright, its best of 15, lets play
F: Hey, I just scored 4 points!
A: What? No you didn't. We just started three seconds ago.
F: Prove I didn't.
A: No, that's not how this works!
F: The referee says that I scored, so that's final.
A: What referee? There's no one else here.
F: Well I can see and hear him, and a lot of other people would agree with me that he exists. So you need to prove that he doesn't.
A: If he's here, then ask him to tell you how many fingers I have behind my back.
F: That's not how this works! You're just angry and bitter that you lack my power to see invisible referees.
M: Hey guys? I see the invisible referee too, and he's telling me that its my turn to use the court.
F: Shut up! You can't be seeing or hearing him, because he agrees with me!
LRH: Hey guys, how would you all like magic powers? Just give me your bank account info, and I promise I'll have to you in a few weeks. Just remember asking for refunds is not permitted.
|
delicatessen - 2010-11-16
you don't believe in god? oh yeah prove it!
|
takewithfood - 2010-11-16
John doesn't believe in any of the gods I don't believe in, except one; coincidentally, it's the only one that requires proof of its non-existence in order not to believe in it.
|
joelkazoo - 2010-11-16
Okay, this guy I like. He's "I don't believe and that is that", not "I am right and you are wrong".
|
Adramelech - 2010-11-17
The caller's inability to grasp a simple concept is hilarious and all, but this weak sauce definition of atheism as a position and not an ideology or a world view is annoying and makes me want to slap every mealy-mouthed that espouses it.
|
Bort - 2010-12-14
Thor and Hercules debate the existence of bloke:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggXTfL1dczk
|
| Register or login To Post a Comment |
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook