yes that's fine, but the issue is about letting everyone make their own decision isn't it?

Zatojones, That is the equivalent argument as saying "I think murder/hockey/stealing/rape/recycling is wrong, but really it should be a personal choice, I dont like it so Im not going to do it, but its up to other people to make up their own minds" When someone believes that something is absolutely morally wrong, it does not translate to leave it up to personal choice.
I am pro-choice.

I agree with RAIN re: personal choice. And you know, I used to be pro-choice, too. But as I got older I guess I got more conservative. Don't get me wrong: I'm as much of a liberal commie socialist queer as the next guy. I'm atheist and happen to despise almost every conservative politician I've ever heard speak. And I know that most abortions are done when the fetus is little more than a blob of gunk. But even still, eh... I just can't get down with it.

It's a mistake to assume that pro-choice advocates are somehow happy about abortion and don't think there's anything disturbing about it. It plays into the typical "pro-abortion" characterization that the other side likes to use.
You can be bothered by abortion and not agree with it and still support the legal right for people to have it based on a deeper and more complex understanding of why human beings need to take control of their own reproductive rights, despite it's uncomfortable aspects at times, and why it's important that abortion be safe and legal.

The great thing about being pro-choice is that you can choose to hate abortions and think they're wrong. Like me, I would never have or perform an abortion, unless maybe it was to save someone's life.

Really? Where at? Not calling anyone out, just interested.

I'm not going to do the Google Fu right now, but basically when it became obvious the film was produced by anti-abortion types, obviously it came under scientific scrutiny. When investigated, basically it came out that the footage had been doctored in numerous ways to elicit an emotional response from viewers, most notably in changing the speed of the footage (slowing down or speeding up). The whole thing is also, obviously, framed from an anti-abortion perspective and presents a side of things that is not supported by any well established doctors or medical scientists. IN other words, it isn't an objective examination of abortion, obviously. So, maybe "debunked" was the wrong term, but the film has been widely discredited.