Oh God... they have their own internets now. I like to remain non-partisan, but the article on evolution is basically comprised of debunked retorts and appeals to populism. More of an ignorant-epidia than having much to do with Conservatism?

"It's a excellent page."

5 stars for moron conservatives showing their ignorance by not using the proper a/an grammar.

(Yeah, I know, I'm picking on his grammar. There so much more I could lampoon, but I'm going for the low hanging fruit here.)

It doesn't have a "liberal" or "atheist" slant?

Meaning it doesn't in any way adhere to scientific data, facts, or testable reality?

This is the amazing achievement of Rupert Murdoch and his ilk: Make even actual facts suspect in your target's mind as "biased" so that they'll believe nearly anything so long as it gets along with their pre-conceived notions about religion, politics, and what "normal" people think.

And nice CRT, by the way.

I'm not sure who to give my stars to: the submitter, charmlessman for the grammar lesson, or SteamPoweredKleenex for the CRT gibe. For now, they're lost in limbo.

What a fucking tool.

Unbiased is a myth.

Citing sources is so liberal.

Also, his videos are unrateable, very common for all the anti evolution people.

It's important to note that this is one of those YouTube fundie, right-winger morons who thinks that "TOTALLY OWNING" people who criticize him means to completely dodge their points and just read something by Rush Limbaugh or a passage from the bible.

I think Orwell was a little to kind when he coined the term "Groupthink". A better term might be "Intellectual Incest". Because that's what happens. Without letting new ideas into the gene pool every now and then, we end up with two-headed retard baby ideas like this one.