Yes, they do. One would think they had enough to keep them busy with actual crimes related to sexual material (child pornography, beastiality, anything else that doesn't involve, you know, consenting adults), but enough of the people that wind up in the positions think that all pornography should be illegal. And pull stunts like this one.
Personally, I don't have any involvement with porn, and I don't particularly like it, but this IS censorship (which should be fucked) and it IS bullshit. Even when a piece of shit like Max Hardcore is the target.
The lesson in all of this is: if you're going to film yourself peeing on and then fucking a girl, make sure she's under age and that you're an R&B star; rather then the girl just looking under age and you being a disgusting old man with a filthy yellow couch.
"Keep porn within limits" sounds jaw-droppingly absurd when you think about the idea of someone other than you getting to determine those limits, and sexual reproduction literally predating the dinosaurs.
Seems the Cambria List is like the comics code of America, except for adults... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Cambria. Sure it has what you'd expect:
-No bukkake
-No rape themes
-No gays
-No niggers on white women
but it also lists:
-No facials (bodyshots are OK if shot is not nasty)
-No spitting or saliva mouth to mouth
-No food used as sex object
-No bi-sex
No Bi-sexy girls? Might as well ask me to rub off while looking at a pile of twigs!
No mention of shit though. Apparently shitting on things (like the constitution) is dandy.
I'm in favor of roping off certain areas of legislation, and only letting people introduce bills regarding those areas if they pass a test on basic science and informal logic.