This is pure propaganda. A private system that spends a large chunk of its budget on finding ways to keep from having to spend the rest of its budget on treating patients is clearly more efficient than a socialist universal plan.
Absolutely. And their property and housing cousins should rightfully have denied as many claims as possible after Hurrican Katrina. They couldn't realistically be expected to honor those contracts or to have any data from 1969 or later that would tell them that 1930s flood and elevation maps were out of date.
Playing shit-headed Objectivist Neocon Capitalist is funny.
That must why the USA has the least efficient healthcare system amongst industrialized nations...oh wait all the others are socialist and universal. Silly Buns Spoonybard! plans.http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_spe_per_per-health-spe nding-per-person
NationMaster - Spending > Per person (most recent) by country
shabumike, if you can't understand why free markets area always the best solution to everything possible, maybe you should just go back to Democratic Underground.
Efficiency is easy if you don't cover one-sixth of the population. Overall effectiveness? Improved health outcomes? Health statistics in line with the rest of the industrialized world? Meh, not so much. Profitable, monetarily efficient "health" corporations? Fuck yeah.
So, the Insur-Animals is what you get when you drop a atom bomb on a insurance van and a train full of animals? I can't decide on if this is the greatest backstory for an animation or the worse.
Good God, I can't stop staring at the animals long enough to pay attention to the fucking video. Apparently the atom bomb made the animals so smart they could build robots out of action figures and gray packing foam.
I can see why the company hired them. If a talking crocodile-man were in charge of my insurance, I would be too amused by the novelty to care that their company profits from the deaths of children.
Reddit
Digg
Stumble
Facebook
